It goes without saying that there are some people in management positions who should not be there at all. Either they are not qualified to be in that position, or they are simply not cut out for being in a position of authority. Not all managers are good, and not all managers are leaders! What is the difference between a manager vs. a leader, and what constitutes a “lame” leader?
Let’s find out . . .
Lame leaders do not lead by example. Setting a standard by doing (practicing what they preach) is a concept that is essentially foreign to them. Rather, their mantra is “Do as I say, not as I do.” True leaders set the example by modeling the behavior they want others to emulate, because they know it comes from the top down.
Lame leaders do not like to be challenged; they always think they are right, and are not open-minded enough to consider another perspective. Some (not all) managers do not like to take chances, or get out of their comfort zones. If they are in a management position by default, and not by choice (or because they are qualified), then they may not possess the vision, clarity, or innovativeness for where their product or company should be headed in the future. Many avoid conflict or other unpleasant situations that make them uncomfortable. They may even take extreme steps for avoidance, including not returning phone calls or emails, being unresponsive, or blaming someone else.
Lame leaders are not professional. What are some examples of not exhibiting professional behaviors? Lame leaders do not say “Thank you” or otherwise acknowledge other people’s efforts (whether they have done a good job, or even at all). They may play favorites, thereby letting some employees get away with certain behaviors but not others, and not applying a uniform standard equally to all employees. They may talk about employees behind their back, or talk about certain employees to other employees. In addition, they may tell you one thing to your face but do or say something else entirely behind your back.
So what are some qualities of good leaders?
True leaders welcome and take advantage of other people’s strengths and use those strengths to their advantage. They know that having smart, creative people on their team will help make them shine along with their whole organization! In contrast, lame leaders are threatened by other people’s strengths. When an employee starts to shine, they immediately put those employees “in their place”! Lame leaders will do everything they can to stay in charge and make sure other people know it. Because they are insecure in themselves, they don’t want anybody else to outshine them.
Real leaders welcome high achievers to their teams because they are secure in their own right. Real leaders embrace what others bring to the table, in terms of knowledge and skills; not only that, they embrace and publicly acknowledge other people’s contributions to an organization. Real leaders are not threatened by, or jealous of, other people’s accomplishments.
What else? Real leaders develop or mentor other people so they can grow and reach their potential, (instead of try to squash them under their thumbs). Real leaders are visionaries. They share their vision with others and form alliances in order to accomplish a goal. Real leaders recognize when something is not working, and are not afraid to change course.
Now I ask you – how about you?
What makes a leader?
Do you have any examples or stories of lame leaders? How about real leaders who inspired you?